Daniel Goldman

Archives for May 2018

The Reaction to Roseanne Barr’s “Ambien Tweets”

By politicoid Leave a Comment May 30

I wanted to discuss the statements of Roseanne Barr, involving Valerie Jarrett, and the consequences of those statements. While the statements are horrible, the reaction was in many ways pathetic. 

First off, let’s compare the crimes of Roseanne Barr and Valerie Jarrett. Barr made a number of apparently racist comments, at the early hours of the morning, on Tuesday May 29, of 2018. That was her crime. Valerie Jarrett worked alongside Barack Obama, as a very close foreign policy adviser, during a period of time when the US military was actively engaging in terrorist strikes (double tap drone strikes) against numerous countries, which slaughtered innocent men, women, and children. At the very least, her crime was never speaking out against those actions. She may very well have been involved in decisions leading to them. So Valerie Jarrett is a war criminal, alongside of Barack Obama. Barr is, at most, a bigot.

Now, Barr decided to partially blame her tweets on Ambien. Elon Musk has also blamed some bizarre tweets on the drug. Is that possible? Yes. The drug has been linked to Impulse-Control disorder (source). But Sanofi responded by saying that racism is not a side effect of the drug. In a way this statement is true. Culture leads to racism. As soon as we have a concept of race, we will start judging people by race. If we hear racist terms, we learn them. That does not mean that we use them, or that we act in a racist way. Why not? Our brain is constantly sifting though responses to stimulus. Most of the time, those responses are rejected. That’s impulse control. Our brain differentiates between correct/proper actions and statements and improper ones. But without impulse control, that changes. Sanofi, I’m sure, is aware of the science, but obviously wants to try to protect itself.

Now, even if Barr was completely aware of what she was saying, and not under the influence of any drug, the reaction was extreme. ABC immediately cancelled the show, which not only punished Barr, but also punished every single person involved in the show. The cast is likely to find new work, but it is going to be much more difficult for the crew to find work. Furthermore, to punish someone so severely, for a tweet, or series of tweets, over the course of a single night, admits that in this world, a single mistake can cost you everything. Of course, some mistakes can. For instance, if you rob a bank, and run over someone while trying to get away, that mistake is very costly. But Jarrett’s crime, as already mentioned, is far worse, and yet she is protected and respected, while Barr and everyone connected with her show, is punished.

Is there a better punishment? I think so. ABC could have told Barr that she could continue working on the show, but as punishment, her pay for the entirety of season 2 would be minimum wage. Then if Barr did not take the option, all of those out of work would be on her shoulders, not anyone else’s. As it stands, ABC has caused significant harm to a lot of people, over a series of tweets.

Further Reading

  • Middle East Turmoil: Radical Islam or Reaction to Imperialism?

The post The Reaction to Roseanne Barr’s “Ambien Tweets” appeared first on Politicoid.

Epistemology: This Page Contains no Harmful Material

By alcanthro Leave a Comment May 26

I created this page to explain a point about epistemology. Default to nonexistence is not universal. Whether or not we default to an assumption of existence or nonexistence depends on necessity. If neither are required, we just don’t make an assumption. If there is more danger if something exists, we assume existence. For instance, we assume drugs have dangerous side effects, until shown otherwise. We’re also risk averse, so even though this page does not contain any harmful material, one might still be cautious about clicking a link to it.

Test #8102753

The post Epistemology: This Page Contains no Harmful Material appeared first on The Spiritual Anthropologist.

Flat Earth? Sure, Why Not?

By daniel Leave a Comment May 2 0

@Geek_0nline offered to clean @GerbusJames’ house, if he could prove that the Earth is flat. I don’t care about this flat Earth nonsense, but I do want a clean house, so here’s my proof of a flat Earth.« Continue »

Recent Posts

  • Musings on Thermodynamics, Complexity, and Evolution
  • A Reply to Gina Rippon’s Commentary on Sex Based Differences in The Brain
  • A Reply to Gina Rippon’s Commentary on Sex Based Differences in The Brain
  • Plants vs Animals
  • Skeptical Tawny Frogmouth

Recent Comments

  • Πάνος Μάντζαρης on Musings on Thermodynamics, Complexity, and Evolution

Archives

  • January 2020
  • September 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • December 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015

Categories

  • Anthropology/Sociology
  • Graphic Novel
  • Health & Medicine
  • Hobbies
  • Living
  • New Research
  • penguinism
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Academics
  • Philosophy of Religion
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Politics
  • Rebuttals
  • Recent News
  • Religion
  • Risk Appetite
  • Roseanne Barr
  • Site News
  • Special Editorial
  • Stock Picks
  • Technical Analysis
  • TV Show
  • Twitter Response
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Daniel Goldman
Copyright © 2022 Daniel Goldman · (in)SPYR Theme by Genesis Developer: SPYR Media